- Main
menu ►
- Life and
institutions
- Tourism & travel
- Places
About-the-USA.com
A learner's guide to
discovering the United States
The seat of judicial power
The nature and functions of the
Supreme
Court are specified in Article 3 of the US
Constitution. The Supreme
Court is the third point in the triangle of power of
federal government
of the United States. While the
President
and his Administration have
executive
power,
and
Congress has
legislative
power, the Supreme court has
judicial
power. This means that its principal role is to judge, when asked to do
so, about the legality of institutional decisions with regard to
federal law (the law of the United States) and the rights of the
people. The Court may be asked to
give judgment on
- the constitutionality of executive or legislative decisions
- disagreements between states or their residents
- decisions made by a lower court that seem to go against an
earlier judgment of the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court building, in
Washington
Any citizen of the United States
of America can petition the Supreme Court, but the process is
usually long, and a petition must first be approved by a
lower court, either the lower levels in the federal court system (a
federal district court and a federal court of appeals) or by a the
supreme court of a state, for example by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma
or the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
On averate the Supreme Court receives
about 7000 petitions a year, but only about 1% of these are granted.
It is important to note that the United
States Supreme Court does
not make up the law *; it interprets the law, meaning that its rulings
are, up to a point, subjective (see Roe vs. Wade below).
* There are some very marginal situations, not relating to everyday
life, in which the Supreme Court can create the law.
Composition of the US Supreme
Court
The Supreme Court is made up of nine
senior judges, these being the Chief Justice and eight Associate
Justices. The court is named for the Chief Justice, and in 2023 is
known as the "Roberts Court" after Chief Justice John Roberts.
The appointment of judges to the Supreme
Court is the prerogative of the President. However since Supreme Court
Judges are appointed for life, and remain in place until they die or
decide to retire, not all presidents get the opportunity to appoint a
judge to the Supreme Court, while others get the opportunity to appoint
two or three new Supreme Court judges.
Appointing judges to the Supreme Court
is thus the way for a President of the United States to ensure that his
political family remains able to influence policy in the United States
long after the end of his presidency. In this respect the appointment
of judges to the Supreme court is an eminently political act;
Democratic presidents tend to appoint judges known for their liberal
interpretion of the law, while Republicans will appoint judges known
for their conservative tendencies.
Donald Trump ensured that the Supreme
Court would remain dominated by conservative judges for several years
to come, by appointing three relatively young and notably
conservative judges, and as of 2023 the Supreme Court was made up of
six judges appointed by Republican presidents, and only three appointed
by Democratic presidents.
Roe vs. Wade
The function and nature of judgments by the Supreme Court are most
vividly exemplified by the historic
Roe
vs. Wade (Roe versus Wade) case. In 1973 a pregnant Texas
woman, known as Jane Roe, filed a suit against Henry Wade, Dallas
County
District Attorney,
in a Texas federal court, claiming that Texas did not have the
constitutional right to prevent her from getting an abortion. The case
was referred to the
Supreme
Court, which ruled in favor of Jane Roe. Abortion was thus
legal throughout the USA for 49 years, until 2022 when a
conservative Supreme Court overturned the 1973 ruling, and determined
that individual states
did
have the right to decide whether abortion was legal in their
jurisdiction.
The Roberts Court's 2022 ruling did not
make abortion illegal throughout the USA; it just meant that some
states, those with very conservative state administrations, could ban
abortion in their state. However the overturning of Roe vs. Wade was a
polarizing decision, that pointed out the increasing politicization of
the Supreme Court, as well as the growing fractures in post-Trumpian
America between "pro-life" conservatives on the one hand, and
"pro-choice" liberals on the other.
Se also:
How united are the
states? The powers of states to govern themselves within the
federalm framawork.